Hate rhetoric vs trust rhetoric in contemporary public discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Rhetoric And Intentions In Discourse
On the face of it these theories are rather similar: both provide hierarchical characterisations of texts, and both seem concerned with the purpose of the text for GSDT, the text realizes the intentional structure that underlies it; and for R.ST, the text is structured in terms of the rhetorical relations that hold between its parts. But these similarities are only skin deep. The kinds of trees...
متن کاملWeb Specifications: Rhetoric vs Reality
There is an increasing awareness within both the research literature and commercial practice that Web systems have a number of unique characteristics. Many organisations are responding to this by identifying modified processes that purport to address these unique characteristics. There is, however, the potential to utilise these processes as a marketing tool (indicating organisational capabilit...
متن کاملOn Discourse Relations, Rhetorical Relations And Rhetoric
Discourses are the collaborative activities of (human) agents who have purposes for communicating. Discourse structure includes the purposes of those agents, which I take, following [GroszSid86], to be formally expressible as intentions and beliefs. While the theory of discourse structures has influenced how many computational linguists think about discourse processing, it does not preclude car...
متن کاملLaw as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Argument
Many lawyers lack a basic understanding of the structure and process of legal argumentation. Their limited understanding, which often leads to less than effective advocacy, stems from legal education's failure to make the structure and process of legal argument explicit and systematic. One approach to this problem is to explore the intrinsic relationship of law to rhetoric. Because law and rhet...
متن کاملRemembering Nyerere: Political Rhetoric and Dissent in Contemporary Tanzania
This article examines the changing uses of political rhetoric around the burial of Julius Nyerere in 1999. It argues that the ruling party uses rhetoric as a means of ‘soft power’, but also documents how this rhetoric, though geared towards legitimizing Nyerere’s successors, employed tropes that were rejected by some people and were used by others to critique leaders who were perceived to lack ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SHS Web of Conferences
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2261-2424
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20197203038